Healthcare campus shown with coordinated clinical spaces, engineering systems and infrastructure

BEFORE CAPITAL COMMITMENT

A Feasibility Study That Produces an Investment Decision.

Demand, site, capacity, regulation, infrastructure, staffing, capital, operating assumptions and project risk are tested as one system—using engineering evidence and operating experience rather than an equipment list.

DECISION, NOT A DESK STUDY

The report must remain useful after the investment committee approves the project.

Infinity IVD can verify assumptions through structured site due diligence, translate an approved case into engineering documents and test operating assumptions against practical facility requirements. The output therefore becomes the controlled input to design and procurement—not a report that has to be rewritten when delivery begins.

Market & demandSite & utilitiesCAPEX & OPEXRegulatory endpointOperating modelDelivery structure

FEASIBILITY DEPTH

Initial Project Assessment

◷ Short-form diagnostic scope · schedule confirmed after scope review

Decision purpose

Answer the first capital question: is there enough market, site and technical logic to continue?

Who it is for

Investors still testing whether the opportunity deserves full feasibility expenditure.

Required client inputs

Target country and intended project type
Investor objective and preliminary capacity ambition
Available land, building or location information
Any existing market, procurement or partner evidence

How the work is performed

Infinity IVD reviews the available evidence, identifies material gaps and tests an initial capacity and regulatory logic. If site information is missing, a remote pre-survey or separately scoped preliminary site visit can establish the minimum evidence required.

Infinity IVD deliverables

Concise project-assessment memorandum
Initial capacity and site suitability logic
Critical information-gap register
Preliminary regulatory orientation
Proceed, redefine or stop recommendation

Decision at completionCommission full feasibility only if the opportunity remains defensible.

FEASIBILITY DEPTH

Bankable Feasibility Framework

◷ Multi-disciplinary study programme · schedule confirmed after scope review

Decision purpose

Convert the opportunity into a controlled technical, commercial and risk framework for a capital decision.

Who it is for

Investors, public institutions and project sponsors preparing for an investment committee, lender or development-finance discussion.

Required client inputs

Approved preliminary scope and product or clinical programme
Market demand, import, pricing and procurement evidence
Financial return expectations and funding assumptions
Corporate, operator and proposed delivery structure
Site survey data, utility records and local constraints

How the work is performed

The work integrates market, process, capacity, site, utilities, staffing, regulatory pathway, CAPEX, OPEX, implementation and risk. A physical survey is included when existing site data cannot support reliable engineering assumptions; specialist testing is separately defined where required.

Infinity IVD deliverables

Demand and capacity basis
Preliminary process and facility concept
Structured CAPEX and OPEX model with assumptions
Implementation programme and critical path
Risk and sensitivity register
Recommended delivery-model and responsibility structure

Decision at completionSubmit the controlled framework for investor review, financing discussion and design-basis authorisation.

FEASIBILITY DEPTH

Design Basis Package

◷ Engineering transition package · schedule confirmed after scope review

Decision purpose

Translate the approved feasibility case into the documents that govern design, equipment selection and package integration.

Who it is for

Investors who have approved the project direction and are ready to enter concept freeze, detailed engineering and procurement.

Required client inputs

Approved feasibility report and decision record
Confirmed capacity tier and regulatory endpoint
Verified site and utility information
Approved owner-supplied and excluded scope
Future-operator requirements and governance decisions

How the work is performed

Clinical or production workflows, zoning, room functions, equipment categories, utilities and project responsibilities are converted into one approved engineering basis. Open decisions remain visible and controlled rather than being hidden inside procurement.

Infinity IVD deliverables

Approved design basis and URS framework
Area schedule and functional adjacencies
Concept zoning and process-flow requirements
Equipment-category and utility schedules
Responsibility and interface matrix
Detailed-engineering and procurement release basis

Decision at completionMove into How We Deliver Gates 2–4 with one controlled basis for design and procurement.

DECISION SNAPSHOT

Three levels of commitment. Three different decision packages.

Phase	Indicative timing	Input depth	Principal output	Next step	Investor profile
Initial Assessment	Short-form; confirmed after data-gap review	Basic objective, destination and available site evidence	Proceed, redefine or stop memorandum	Full feasibility	Exploring the opportunity
Bankable Framework	Multi-disciplinary; confirmed after survey scope	Market, finance, organisation and verified site basis	CAPEX/OPEX, risk, programme and delivery-model framework	Investment review and design basis	Preparing capital or financing decision
Design Basis Package	Engineering programme; confirmed after scope approval	Approved feasibility, capacity, endpoint and site information	URS, area, flow, utilities, equipment and responsibility basis	Detailed engineering and procurement	Approved and ready to build

Published schedules are not standardised because project type, country, evidence quality, survey requirements and specialist studies materially change the programme. The proposal records the actual schedule before work starts.

WHY THE METHOD IS DIFFERENT

Every assumption must survive contact with the facility.

Site reality

When supplied information is insufficient, the required evidence is collected through remote due diligence or an agreed physical survey.

Operating reality

Staffing, maintenance, utilisation, consumables and ramp-up assumptions are tested against the requirements of operating healthcare and manufacturing assets.

Direct applicability

The approved package connects directly to the engineering, interface and procurement gates in How We Deliver ↗.

Model independence

The evidence determines the structure. EPC, EPCM, BOT, JV, licence and phased CAPEX are compared in Investment Models ↗.

FROM ASSUMPTION TO OPERATION

Who will operate the facility is a feasibility question.

The future operator affects staffing, quality ownership, maintenance, working capital, training and ramp-up. Infinity IVD can define operator-readiness requirements and, where separately contracted, support an operating and transfer structure. Detailed BOT and operating-responsibility models are addressed on the Investment Models page.

Review BOT responsibility structure ↗

INVESTOR QUESTIONS

Uncertainty should be visible before the study begins.

01What if we have no reliable site data?+

The assessment can begin with the location, project objective and information already available. Infinity IVD first records the data gap, then proposes remote pre-survey, owner data requests or a separately scoped site visit. Material site assumptions are not silently treated as verified facts.

02What happens if the study recommends no-go?+

A no-go result protects capital from being committed to an unsupported scope. The investor still receives the assumptions, evidence gaps, risks and conditions that would need to change before the opportunity could be reconsidered. The value of the work is the decision—not a predetermined approval.

03Can Infinity IVD continue from a study prepared by another adviser?+

Yes, subject to a structured review. Existing market, technical, financial and site material is assessed for currency, traceability and completeness. Valid work is retained; missing or conflicting assumptions are placed in a gap register before engineering proceeds.

04Does feasibility lock the project into EPC, BOT or a joint venture?+

No. The delivery model is an output of the study, not a predetermined sales route. Ownership, funding, operating responsibility and country risk are compared before a recommendation is made. BOT and joint-venture structures remain subject to country-specific legal, tax and financial review.

05Is a physical site visit always required?+

Not for every initial assessment. Remote review may be sufficient to decide whether full feasibility is justified. A physical survey becomes necessary when access, dimensions, utilities, structure, logistics or local conditions materially affect cost, programme or technical viability.

06Does a bankable feasibility framework guarantee financing?+

No. Infinity IVD produces a structured technical and commercial framework that can support financing discussions. Acceptance, lending terms and investment approval remain decisions of the relevant bank, development institution, government body or investor.

BEFORE EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT

Commission feasibility before locking capital into equipment.

Start with a structured project brief, or use the project desk for an initial discussion about scope and available evidence.

Request Feasibility ↗Talk to the Project Desk ↗