Human judgment at scale
Convert subjective user expectations into consistent, machine-readable preference and quality signals.
Start a project ↗Infinity designs and operates structured feedback programs that help AI systems become more useful, accurate, safe and aligned—from preference data and response scoring to expert review and production feedback.
Many model failures are not simple right-or-wrong errors. Helpfulness, tone, reasoning quality, cultural fit and safety require contextual human judgment. Infinity turns these nuanced decisions into a controlled operating system with clear rubrics, trained reviewers, quality controls and traceable outcomes.
Your team defines the intended behavior. Infinity builds the people, process and quality layer required to produce dependable feedback signals at scale.
Convert subjective user expectations into consistent, machine-readable preference and quality signals.
Teach models which responses are genuinely useful, safe, accurate and appropriate for the intended audience.
Reviewer certification and recurring calibration reduce disagreement before it becomes dataset noise.
Structured error categories connect feedback directly to training, evaluation and product priorities.
Specialist reviewers assess claims and reasoning that generalist teams cannot reliably validate.
Agreement, audit outcomes and adjudication records reveal how trustworthy each feedback signal is.
Compare candidate responses and identify the output that best satisfies the user intent and defined policy.
Score accuracy, relevance, completeness, clarity, style and safety against program-specific criteria.
Transform weak model outputs into high-quality reference responses with documented correction reasons.
Evaluate multi-turn coherence, instruction following, memory, tone and recovery from user corrections.
Identify harmful, deceptive, biased or policy-sensitive behavior and capture structured severity signals.
Route medical, scientific, legal, financial, technical and multilingual tasks to qualified reviewers.
Probe difficult prompts, ambiguous instructions and edge cases to expose hidden model weaknesses.
Review real-world model interactions, cluster recurring failures and prioritize improvement opportunities.
We combine qualification tests, gold-standard tasks, blind review and structured adjudication to ensure feedback reflects the rubric—not reviewer preference or fatigue.
Feedback environments can be segmented by data sensitivity, domain, language and reviewer qualification. Access and escalation policies are designed around each program’s risk profile.
Clarify model use, target behavior, risks, languages and feedback objectives.
Build rubrics, examples, certification tasks and a measurable pilot.
Run certified teams, layered QA, expert escalation and delivery reporting.
Analyze disagreement and failures to refine rubrics, models and product priorities.
Share your model type, feedback objective, domain, languages, risk profile and target volume. We will structure the complete program.
Discuss your feedback program ↗